A key goal is to give the Pentagon evidence its rightful place in the efforts of the Truth Movement to spread awareness of the lies in the 9/11 official story
Thank you Craig. It has been disappointing to see the fragmentation of the 9/11 truth movement. As an early signatory of the AE911 petition(citizen) I was challenged by the lack of outreach to the general public and the limited focus of all the groups: Firefighters, Pilots, Architects/Engineers, Etc... As society is transitioning toward a more "aware" sense of government/Deep State activity I believe it is imperative to keep our focus on outreach to the masses. In a way, COVID may have been a wake up call that cannot be ignored or forgotten. These days I refer any curious minds I encounter to The Corbett Report and the wealth of information therein. Your efforts are very much appreciated. Spread the Word.
Gratitude for your principled approach to what was the most cataclysmic event of the turning century. For my own experience having gone to the towers and plaza in the summer of 2001 and undergoing a powerful premonition this is redeeming and necessary to know that my internal alarm bells correctly predicted the disaster while it was being staged. Seeing the global fallout from the end of diplomatic proceedings in US foreign policy and the overt assumption of false narratives to carry out wars with zero justification or congressional approval has been eye opening and career ending. Millions of lives lost, the complete destruction of public faith in institutions and the passage of the Patriot Act changed the shape of our national reputation and gutted the place of pride once held by democracy as a political standard. We stand where we are today because 9/11 tore down the illusion of inalienable rights, due process, and rational debate. It was the day autocracy was crowned for the kings to come. Revealing any and all truths about that day is a mandatory healing process that may or may not save US. Faith may never be restored but justice may be served.
I'm not an american but I think you are where you, and the rest of the world are today because of the government you have now. This is the government that I'm pretty sure , many in the truth movement voted for on the basis that the whole 9/11 'inside job' evidence would be exposed because it was all carried out by 'the government' and 'the media' If people actually believe that the goverment of the US planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks would that cause them to totally distrust the goverment of their own country and be open to believing anything that was suggested they were responsible for? So along comes the snake oil salesman to capitalise on that nonsense, promising to deconstruct this evil government for them and reveal the truth! How is that working out for you?
Less than 25% of Americans voted for this government because of the way the electoral college skews results and the fact that half of America doesn’t vote at all. I think if you were so desperate for something different that you voted for an obvious snake oil salesman, you need to reevaluate your political life choices. He won the demographic he did because of racism and misogyny. Plain and simple. Because white men are obsolete. They know the planet isn’t like them so they seek to dominate in any way possible. The true global minority, vocal and dysfunctional. Scrambling to stay relevant. F thegvt. F global elites. Sink more billionaires and build more guillotines
Dear Ms. Sarina Pepper, You wrote: "Less than 25% of Americans voted for this government because of the way the electoral college skews results and the fact that half of America doesn’t vote at all."
You comment is valid in most normal elections. It does not apply to the 2024 election. Why?
Because Frump with Elon Musk's DOGE hackers manipulated the election tabulation machines. On top of active voter suppression, voter roll purging, re-districting, and other tricks to disenfranchise voters, they finally hacked the voting system, which victory in ALL of the swing states proves (never happened in history even with popular presidents). How?
So voting machines themselves were secure, even when on a local network. Nobody could easily hack into that, and certainly not at the scale needed to swing a local, let alone national, election. However, the voting machines needed power, constant power. So the voting machines were attached to smart universal power supplies (UPS), so if the grid went down, votes could still be counted. Did I say they were "smart UPS"? This means they had trusted communication with the voting machines. And the smart UPS also communication with Musk's skylink satellites. A fix labeled "minor" was pushed from Musk's satellites to the smart UPS's, who in turn used their trusted communication link with the voting machines to push up a portion of "the fix."
Election Truth Alliance lays out well the anomalies in voting results at the county level (for various states and races). In summary, when vote totals for a given county were below a certain threshold of total votes, they stats tracked one way across all races. Using a threshold, it could pass pre-voting test runs. However, after the vote totals exceeded the threshold, the stats starting shifting and tracking another way. The analysis wasn't just for the top-level race, but also down-ticket races for Governor, Senator, Representatives, local officials, and ballot initiatives.
In short, vote history always has a strong correlation between races on a ballot; votes for a candidate of one party typically are reflected with other candidates of that party in down-stream races. Sure, there's always exceptions where two candidates from the same party in two different races don't receive the exact same number of votes; voters don't always vote every ballot along party lines.
With 2024, the anomaly is that counties with numbers above the threshold starting swinging dramatically towards Frump (GOP) despite many downstream races and ballot initiatives going to DEMs. What makes it hard to believe is that a significant percentage of DEM voters would suddenly switch their vote at the top of the ticket for an adjudicated rapist, a convicted felon, a serial sexual predators, (and pedophile) instead of for a highly qualified woman who was not any of those things.
Add to this the winning of ALL of the swing states, the repetitive psyops of 2020 election being stolen (so the public would lose their taste at investigating 2024 election as being stolen).
In the run-up to the 2024 election, I managed to read second-hand the right-wing Epoch Times. What stands out in 20/20 hindsight was their certainty that Frump was going to win 2024 and the plans that they had and how the world would be. They lauded the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 and its authors, while also "distancing it from Frump". No surprise that project Frump 47 administration implements (or is trying to implement) all of Project 2025.
So what bothers me was their certainty, despite the extremely high unfavorability ratings of Frump.
You honestly are preaching to the choir. I was an election inspector for almost fifteen years. I know exactly how the hardware setup is designed to be accessible. To anyone with ill intent, which is what I believe technocracy embodies exclusively. There is no good will, only nefarious schemes. It’s boys with their toys and the world is an unwitting victim. Ego death is what they are trying to escape. But it comes for us all.
I like the approach to not get bogged down answering every single question. It is normal for there to be some unknown.
I find it amazing how many still support the official narrative. It is ridiculous! Everywhere I look more than surface level on 9/11 is strange. I won't purport to know all the answers but there is no way in hell it happened like the government said.
9/11 might be the single biggest act of evil by the US Gov't, and that is saying something. It was done before widespread, hourly internet use by the entire globe, so they were sloppy relative to today. What disappoints me the most is the turf war between the AE911truth.org vs Dr Judy Wood groups. The normies will have a hard time believing this, and it will be an uphill fight to get mass belief changing, but it can be done. It's hard for people to admit they have been naive chumps their entire adult lives.
I see no value in the turf war you mention. This is why my new group is going to act strategically. In other words, we're going to focus on the ways we can best expose the 9/11 lies so that they can be understood by the general public. Since we have already made an extremely strong case for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers, I see no benefit to endlessly pushing the Judy Wood theory. We've already proven our case, and this just muddies the water.
i see no value in arguing over the "how"...thermite vs DEW seams like a rounding error...the fact that two 1360 feet tall buildings fell to the ground in 12 and 10 seconds respectively, is enough proof that it wasn't the plane.
Well, I think we do have evidence of thermite in the WTC dust, so that's part of the case for controlled demolition. I don't think we should toss that evidence out because some people think that directed energy weapons were used. The key for me is proving the official story false. We've done that already with the WTC, so there is no point in continuing this internal debate, in my opinion.
I was excited to see this article and after reading it thought 'finally' but now i have read through the comments I am really disappointed. Why wont the EVIDENCE Dr Wood has identified be talked about? Forget controlled demolition / thermite / nukes / DEWs for a second and just think about the actual evidence she has, that everyone can see with their own eyes. She even filed a Qui Tam case against the NIST contractors for fraud. I was a supporter of AE911truth, until around 6 months ago when I came across Dr Wood and I am amazed that this evidence was left out of the initial NIST investigation and is dismissed by so called 9/11 truthers. From the research I have done into AE911truth, they don't have a compiled list of actual EVIDENCE to support their claims, they have a theory. Dr Wood provides actual EVIDENCE that has been ignored and needs to be seriously considered as a whole as it being ignored by the truth groups appears to me that they have picked their faviourite theory and only make claims to support that theory. Any ACTUAL EVIDENCE ae911truth have and the EVIDENCE of Dr Wood and Reynolds need to be all put together and considered as a whole before coming to any conclusion. I really think the work of Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds needs to be taken seriously by truth groups! As far as I can see, AE911truth are more focused on spending the funding they actual receive on media promotion / wages and expenses, why isn't this money being used to conduct real resarch and an independent investigation if they really wanted the truth, they keep shouting that they want an independent investigation well why not conduct their own proper independent tests. The thermite being found in samples is not credible, there is no chain of custody for the sample, it was such a small sample, their is paint explanation that is plausible. AE911 don't seem to have a list of all the evidence they have that supports their theory, if they really wanted the truth they would look at ALL the eviidence. If they do have actual evidence, then this along with the Dr Wood evidence should be considered as a whole before coming to any conclusions. No one can state they know exactly what brought those towers down, but basic IGNORED evidence from Wood and Reynolds wouldn't be present if CD / thermite / mini nukes / fire had occurred so something else was the cause and this needs to be the most important thing. Gathering EVERY bit of evidence, conducting independent testing & that will point to the cause. The evidence should be the most important thing that the public is made aware of, when they can see all of the ignored evidence there will be more push for independent inquiry. Ignoring certain evidence is never going to find the truth. Im really disappointed that you have ruled out Dr Wood.
I have not ruled out anything. I have just said that our group will not focus on that. I encourage you or others who agree with you to form a group in support of Judy Wood. I don't see the value of doing this because I don't think this endless debate will get us anywhere. If you think you have a way to use Wood's "theory" to destroy the 9/11 official story, then please let us know. But I don't think that way exists. So I'm going to make the strategic choice to focus on evidence that will help us to expose the lies.
Respectfully, if you believe the case is already proven, then additional observable evidence shouldn't 'muddy the water'. It should either reinforce your conclusion or challenge it. Choosing not to examine certain evidence because it complicates the picture isn't strategy it's pre-selection. You say you haven't rule anything out, yet you have already decided what you will and wont focus on. thats not an investigation its curaton. If we truly want the truth evidence is evidence, no matter where it comes from, it shouldn't be filtered based on which hypothesis it supports. Wood has documented physical effects in the record. If the CD is 'already proven' can you tell me what the consolidated evidence set that lays out the evidence please, I genuinely cannot find one so that I can look at all the evidence as a whole.
Dear Mr. Mystic Bazaar, I read your comments to Mr. Craig McKee all the way down in the thread, but am going to create another discussion fork here higher up.
I guess it doesn't really matter whether we believe your backstory on how you came upon Dr. Judy Wood, or if maybe some form of sock-puppetry was in action for how your eifer in plugging Dr. Judy Wood has resemblance to Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist or other Woodsian-DEWers, and possibly those posting in other postings.
I will use my super-powers of being naive and trusting (until given reason not to be) and give you the benefit of the doubt: that you aren't a sockpuppet (of some prior persona); that you are sincere; that you are genuine; and that you desire the Truth.
I encourage you to go Mr. McKee's other posting "There's a new player on the field: Exposing 9/11"
You'll notice that Ms. Kirsten, like you, also had a first posting that plugs Dr. Judy Wood's book. And you'll see that she and I had a discussion on the merits of said book as well as the plausibility of "nuclear-DEW" or exotic nukes or fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW).
Please read that discussion there and if necessary chime in there (to me as a fork early in the branch, like I have done here). No sense us repeating the same factoids here.
In fact, Mr. McKee would be justified in having a conniption fit if you and I were to rabbit-on here: Woodsian-DEW versus FGNW.
SPOILER: Ms. Kirsten's very last line to me was: "I will not read your reply or respond to you again." I seem to recall Mr. Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist also effectively writing me that; he blocks me on substack.
Hi, first of all I was not plugging Wood's book and unsure what you mean by sock puppetry. I was asking a genuine question as to why the evidence is never mentioned or taken seriously, and I genuinely wanted to look at what the evidence was for CD, which I have now. I was not trying to point to any particular cause for 9/11, whether it dew, cd, thermite, mini nukes, the official narrative or pancake, I genuinely don't understand why there are different 'camps' and why all the evidence from every camp isn't looked at as a whole. Despite the hostility i go for mentioning Dr Wood, the evidence is evidence, CD has their evidence etc, I thought that to find the outcome of something all evidence had to be considered before a conclusion could be made and that was what I was trying to say. I have read the conversation you referred me too, and you put the link to your blog in there, so I am going to go and read your work as I am genuinely interested to see from all perspectives first as I don't think anyone can claim to know the real reason for that day. I think most people agree it was an inside job and that the NIST investigation was BS. I just was asking a geniune question as to why Wood's evidence isn't considered, and not just Wood's but the evidence from all camps, they should all be part of a new investigation to find out the truth. I look forward to looking at your blog and seeing your side of things. I know we all want the truth about what happened that day.
Dear Mr. Nick Carraway and Mr. Craig McKee, The parallelism between 9/11 Truth and the Epstein files.
Those in positions of legal authority knew sufficient details from (portions of) the Epstein files to have justification and cause to initiate legal actions to prevent further crimes. They did not. And in cases, they covered it up.
If we consider, say, AE9/11Truth to be in a position of authority on 9/11 Truth, it was hamstrung much like authorities with Epstein. To Mr. McKee's point, look no further than the Pentagon (pun-intended) to see AE9/11T scope-limited. I'm just a member of the choir singing: "And that is not all AE9/11T scope-limited."
Mr. McKee wrote: "I think we do have evidence of thermite in the WTC dust."
Is that another AE9/11T scope-limit? I mean, we also have:
- Dust reports showing Uranium, Barium, and Stronium and all of their decay elements, indicating evidence of fission process.
- Water run-off reports showing Tritium, but having to re-define "trace levels" to be 55 times greater in order to explain away "the insignificance" of it. Tritium is a building block of all modern nuclear weapons.
- Videos that show radiation leaching off of the debris piles and selected pieces at Fresh Kills. The video tape technology of last century was high succeptible to radiation, causing glitches that wouldn't be noticed by the camera operator until play-back.
Mr. Carraway wrote: "i see no value in arguing over the 'how'...thermite vs DEW seams like a rounding error..."
Funny, because I think both sides of "thermite vs. DEW" are purposeful disinformation. Not rounding errors, but complete misdirections. Both can be debunked. [References available upon request.] So I guess I have to agree about there being no value in arging "thermite vs. DEW".
Of course, my 9/11 hobby-horse is exotic pre-mature fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW) that could be summarized as "nuclear-DEW." Think, 4 FGNW per detonation level and, say, 10 detonation levels per tower. Each hybrid fission-fusion; fission stage isn't designed for destruction but for heat requisite for the fusion stage; fusion stage isn't designed for destruction by heat wave and blast wave, but for the targeted release of highly energetic neutrons. Cone-shaped output. Mounted on outside walls of the inner core. Aimed upwards and away from the inner core on which they were mounted. [Gives rises to the anomaly called "the spire".]
[Bat-shit wild-ass speculation] One of the reasons given for JFK's un-aliving was his refusal to allow Israel nuclear weapons. Israel went on to steal US nuclear secrets, develop its own bombs, and perform nuclear tests, all the thumbing its nose at the UN's nuclear non-proliferation agreement and at allowing UN nuclear inspectors into Israel. Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty. Israel committed genocide in Gaza.
If we give any credance:
- to the "five dancing Arabs" or those in a moving van who were detained, not interrogated, flown back to Israel, and later on TV admitted they were Mossad agents charged with filming the 9/11 events.
- to the Israeli arts students on residence in the towers.
- to how Mossad agents lived closed to and monitored the Arab patsies given responsibility for the hijackings.
- to Chertoff and other Zionists and Christian Zionists in the G.W.Bush Administration.
Then it isn't a far-fetched to connect Israeli nuclear ambitions with 9/11 at the WTC. However, Israel has its hands so deep into the pockets of US arsenals, the 9/11 FGNW were probably US made. Israel was boots-to-the-ground while VP Cheney ran cover by distracting the military responses and coordinating the precision of the attacks.
What did Israel gain aside from the many billions the US gives them every year? The US fought Israeli wars and took out Israeli enemies (and enemies of the central bank).
The Israeli use of nukes on 9/11 is similar to the autrocities documented in the Epstein files. Namely, public revelation -- of the (1) nuclear usage on ourselves or (2) sexual assault => ritualistic murder of innocent children -- ought to lead to ...
... And there we have it. What the truth ought to lead to often doesn't, by design. And it is the "in your face" cover-up that pisses us off the most.
In summary, why the details of 9/11 destruction do matter is that they help reveal the callousness of the true perpetrators (Zionists) and may help nuclear-energize (pun intended) other movements, such as those against Frump fascism and Epstein-class crimes.
I agree...they did not just pancake down. There is no way - all the evidence screams something else. Likely bombs but I suppose DEW could be right. It doesn't really matter.
While I agree that there is definitely evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11, as a Gentile who loves Israel and the Jewish people, I would ask that comments about Jewish involvement be balanced against the v obvious lead role that was played by the US Govt and it's talking parrot, the Mockingbird Media.
I am not the least interested in airbrushing Mossad involvement.
I simply ask for a fair hearing that is not fraud my ed in traditional Jew-hatred language.
Great to hear someone talking sense about 9/11. It needs to be on top of the political agenda disppite all the other crimes comitted since: wars, epstein/trump/CIA/Mossad).
What is indisputable about the 9/11 case is the massive coverup which is admitted to by FEMA and NIST. They admit to the destruction of evidence and to not searching for explosives. Both are the essence of high treason. So is the withholding of the numerous videotapes possibly showing what really hit Pentagon. So is the numerous other destructions /withholding of crucial evidence. Why is this so hard to accept by the legal system, and the otherwise sharp intellectual elite??
My apologies for not commenting on the principles, at the time when you first posted them.
The reason that I didn't comment was because they were so well laid out, so carefully thought through, so utterly reasonable, there wasn't anything else left to say!
On reflection, it would have been much kinder to have said this at the time.
Thank you Craig. It has been disappointing to see the fragmentation of the 9/11 truth movement. As an early signatory of the AE911 petition(citizen) I was challenged by the lack of outreach to the general public and the limited focus of all the groups: Firefighters, Pilots, Architects/Engineers, Etc... As society is transitioning toward a more "aware" sense of government/Deep State activity I believe it is imperative to keep our focus on outreach to the masses. In a way, COVID may have been a wake up call that cannot be ignored or forgotten. These days I refer any curious minds I encounter to The Corbett Report and the wealth of information therein. Your efforts are very much appreciated. Spread the Word.
Gratitude for your principled approach to what was the most cataclysmic event of the turning century. For my own experience having gone to the towers and plaza in the summer of 2001 and undergoing a powerful premonition this is redeeming and necessary to know that my internal alarm bells correctly predicted the disaster while it was being staged. Seeing the global fallout from the end of diplomatic proceedings in US foreign policy and the overt assumption of false narratives to carry out wars with zero justification or congressional approval has been eye opening and career ending. Millions of lives lost, the complete destruction of public faith in institutions and the passage of the Patriot Act changed the shape of our national reputation and gutted the place of pride once held by democracy as a political standard. We stand where we are today because 9/11 tore down the illusion of inalienable rights, due process, and rational debate. It was the day autocracy was crowned for the kings to come. Revealing any and all truths about that day is a mandatory healing process that may or may not save US. Faith may never be restored but justice may be served.
I'm not an american but I think you are where you, and the rest of the world are today because of the government you have now. This is the government that I'm pretty sure , many in the truth movement voted for on the basis that the whole 9/11 'inside job' evidence would be exposed because it was all carried out by 'the government' and 'the media' If people actually believe that the goverment of the US planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks would that cause them to totally distrust the goverment of their own country and be open to believing anything that was suggested they were responsible for? So along comes the snake oil salesman to capitalise on that nonsense, promising to deconstruct this evil government for them and reveal the truth! How is that working out for you?
Less than 25% of Americans voted for this government because of the way the electoral college skews results and the fact that half of America doesn’t vote at all. I think if you were so desperate for something different that you voted for an obvious snake oil salesman, you need to reevaluate your political life choices. He won the demographic he did because of racism and misogyny. Plain and simple. Because white men are obsolete. They know the planet isn’t like them so they seek to dominate in any way possible. The true global minority, vocal and dysfunctional. Scrambling to stay relevant. F thegvt. F global elites. Sink more billionaires and build more guillotines
Dear Ms. Sarina Pepper, You wrote: "Less than 25% of Americans voted for this government because of the way the electoral college skews results and the fact that half of America doesn’t vote at all."
You comment is valid in most normal elections. It does not apply to the 2024 election. Why?
Because Frump with Elon Musk's DOGE hackers manipulated the election tabulation machines. On top of active voter suppression, voter roll purging, re-districting, and other tricks to disenfranchise voters, they finally hacked the voting system, which victory in ALL of the swing states proves (never happened in history even with popular presidents). How?
So voting machines themselves were secure, even when on a local network. Nobody could easily hack into that, and certainly not at the scale needed to swing a local, let alone national, election. However, the voting machines needed power, constant power. So the voting machines were attached to smart universal power supplies (UPS), so if the grid went down, votes could still be counted. Did I say they were "smart UPS"? This means they had trusted communication with the voting machines. And the smart UPS also communication with Musk's skylink satellites. A fix labeled "minor" was pushed from Musk's satellites to the smart UPS's, who in turn used their trusted communication link with the voting machines to push up a portion of "the fix."
Election Truth Alliance lays out well the anomalies in voting results at the county level (for various states and races). In summary, when vote totals for a given county were below a certain threshold of total votes, they stats tracked one way across all races. Using a threshold, it could pass pre-voting test runs. However, after the vote totals exceeded the threshold, the stats starting shifting and tracking another way. The analysis wasn't just for the top-level race, but also down-ticket races for Governor, Senator, Representatives, local officials, and ballot initiatives.
In short, vote history always has a strong correlation between races on a ballot; votes for a candidate of one party typically are reflected with other candidates of that party in down-stream races. Sure, there's always exceptions where two candidates from the same party in two different races don't receive the exact same number of votes; voters don't always vote every ballot along party lines.
With 2024, the anomaly is that counties with numbers above the threshold starting swinging dramatically towards Frump (GOP) despite many downstream races and ballot initiatives going to DEMs. What makes it hard to believe is that a significant percentage of DEM voters would suddenly switch their vote at the top of the ticket for an adjudicated rapist, a convicted felon, a serial sexual predators, (and pedophile) instead of for a highly qualified woman who was not any of those things.
Add to this the winning of ALL of the swing states, the repetitive psyops of 2020 election being stolen (so the public would lose their taste at investigating 2024 election as being stolen).
In the run-up to the 2024 election, I managed to read second-hand the right-wing Epoch Times. What stands out in 20/20 hindsight was their certainty that Frump was going to win 2024 and the plans that they had and how the world would be. They lauded the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 and its authors, while also "distancing it from Frump". No surprise that project Frump 47 administration implements (or is trying to implement) all of Project 2025.
So what bothers me was their certainty, despite the extremely high unfavorability ratings of Frump.
//
You honestly are preaching to the choir. I was an election inspector for almost fifteen years. I know exactly how the hardware setup is designed to be accessible. To anyone with ill intent, which is what I believe technocracy embodies exclusively. There is no good will, only nefarious schemes. It’s boys with their toys and the world is an unwitting victim. Ego death is what they are trying to escape. But it comes for us all.
Thank you, a significant expansion of the Truth evidence is essential.
I look forward to listening to, learning, and supporting this initiative.
Thanks, Frank!
I like the approach to not get bogged down answering every single question. It is normal for there to be some unknown.
I find it amazing how many still support the official narrative. It is ridiculous! Everywhere I look more than surface level on 9/11 is strange. I won't purport to know all the answers but there is no way in hell it happened like the government said.
9/11 might be the single biggest act of evil by the US Gov't, and that is saying something. It was done before widespread, hourly internet use by the entire globe, so they were sloppy relative to today. What disappoints me the most is the turf war between the AE911truth.org vs Dr Judy Wood groups. The normies will have a hard time believing this, and it will be an uphill fight to get mass belief changing, but it can be done. It's hard for people to admit they have been naive chumps their entire adult lives.
I see no value in the turf war you mention. This is why my new group is going to act strategically. In other words, we're going to focus on the ways we can best expose the 9/11 lies so that they can be understood by the general public. Since we have already made an extremely strong case for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers, I see no benefit to endlessly pushing the Judy Wood theory. We've already proven our case, and this just muddies the water.
i see no value in arguing over the "how"...thermite vs DEW seams like a rounding error...the fact that two 1360 feet tall buildings fell to the ground in 12 and 10 seconds respectively, is enough proof that it wasn't the plane.
Well, I think we do have evidence of thermite in the WTC dust, so that's part of the case for controlled demolition. I don't think we should toss that evidence out because some people think that directed energy weapons were used. The key for me is proving the official story false. We've done that already with the WTC, so there is no point in continuing this internal debate, in my opinion.
I was excited to see this article and after reading it thought 'finally' but now i have read through the comments I am really disappointed. Why wont the EVIDENCE Dr Wood has identified be talked about? Forget controlled demolition / thermite / nukes / DEWs for a second and just think about the actual evidence she has, that everyone can see with their own eyes. She even filed a Qui Tam case against the NIST contractors for fraud. I was a supporter of AE911truth, until around 6 months ago when I came across Dr Wood and I am amazed that this evidence was left out of the initial NIST investigation and is dismissed by so called 9/11 truthers. From the research I have done into AE911truth, they don't have a compiled list of actual EVIDENCE to support their claims, they have a theory. Dr Wood provides actual EVIDENCE that has been ignored and needs to be seriously considered as a whole as it being ignored by the truth groups appears to me that they have picked their faviourite theory and only make claims to support that theory. Any ACTUAL EVIDENCE ae911truth have and the EVIDENCE of Dr Wood and Reynolds need to be all put together and considered as a whole before coming to any conclusion. I really think the work of Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds needs to be taken seriously by truth groups! As far as I can see, AE911truth are more focused on spending the funding they actual receive on media promotion / wages and expenses, why isn't this money being used to conduct real resarch and an independent investigation if they really wanted the truth, they keep shouting that they want an independent investigation well why not conduct their own proper independent tests. The thermite being found in samples is not credible, there is no chain of custody for the sample, it was such a small sample, their is paint explanation that is plausible. AE911 don't seem to have a list of all the evidence they have that supports their theory, if they really wanted the truth they would look at ALL the eviidence. If they do have actual evidence, then this along with the Dr Wood evidence should be considered as a whole before coming to any conclusions. No one can state they know exactly what brought those towers down, but basic IGNORED evidence from Wood and Reynolds wouldn't be present if CD / thermite / mini nukes / fire had occurred so something else was the cause and this needs to be the most important thing. Gathering EVERY bit of evidence, conducting independent testing & that will point to the cause. The evidence should be the most important thing that the public is made aware of, when they can see all of the ignored evidence there will be more push for independent inquiry. Ignoring certain evidence is never going to find the truth. Im really disappointed that you have ruled out Dr Wood.
I have not ruled out anything. I have just said that our group will not focus on that. I encourage you or others who agree with you to form a group in support of Judy Wood. I don't see the value of doing this because I don't think this endless debate will get us anywhere. If you think you have a way to use Wood's "theory" to destroy the 9/11 official story, then please let us know. But I don't think that way exists. So I'm going to make the strategic choice to focus on evidence that will help us to expose the lies.
Respectfully, if you believe the case is already proven, then additional observable evidence shouldn't 'muddy the water'. It should either reinforce your conclusion or challenge it. Choosing not to examine certain evidence because it complicates the picture isn't strategy it's pre-selection. You say you haven't rule anything out, yet you have already decided what you will and wont focus on. thats not an investigation its curaton. If we truly want the truth evidence is evidence, no matter where it comes from, it shouldn't be filtered based on which hypothesis it supports. Wood has documented physical effects in the record. If the CD is 'already proven' can you tell me what the consolidated evidence set that lays out the evidence please, I genuinely cannot find one so that I can look at all the evidence as a whole.
Dear Mr. Mystic Bazaar, I read your comments to Mr. Craig McKee all the way down in the thread, but am going to create another discussion fork here higher up.
I guess it doesn't really matter whether we believe your backstory on how you came upon Dr. Judy Wood, or if maybe some form of sock-puppetry was in action for how your eifer in plugging Dr. Judy Wood has resemblance to Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist or other Woodsian-DEWers, and possibly those posting in other postings.
I will use my super-powers of being naive and trusting (until given reason not to be) and give you the benefit of the doubt: that you aren't a sockpuppet (of some prior persona); that you are sincere; that you are genuine; and that you desire the Truth.
I encourage you to go Mr. McKee's other posting "There's a new player on the field: Exposing 9/11"
https://exposing911.substack.com/p/theres-a-new-player-on-the-field
You'll notice that Ms. Kirsten, like you, also had a first posting that plugs Dr. Judy Wood's book. And you'll see that she and I had a discussion on the merits of said book as well as the plausibility of "nuclear-DEW" or exotic nukes or fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW).
Please read that discussion there and if necessary chime in there (to me as a fork early in the branch, like I have done here). No sense us repeating the same factoids here.
In fact, Mr. McKee would be justified in having a conniption fit if you and I were to rabbit-on here: Woodsian-DEW versus FGNW.
SPOILER: Ms. Kirsten's very last line to me was: "I will not read your reply or respond to you again." I seem to recall Mr. Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist also effectively writing me that; he blocks me on substack.
//
Hi, first of all I was not plugging Wood's book and unsure what you mean by sock puppetry. I was asking a genuine question as to why the evidence is never mentioned or taken seriously, and I genuinely wanted to look at what the evidence was for CD, which I have now. I was not trying to point to any particular cause for 9/11, whether it dew, cd, thermite, mini nukes, the official narrative or pancake, I genuinely don't understand why there are different 'camps' and why all the evidence from every camp isn't looked at as a whole. Despite the hostility i go for mentioning Dr Wood, the evidence is evidence, CD has their evidence etc, I thought that to find the outcome of something all evidence had to be considered before a conclusion could be made and that was what I was trying to say. I have read the conversation you referred me too, and you put the link to your blog in there, so I am going to go and read your work as I am genuinely interested to see from all perspectives first as I don't think anyone can claim to know the real reason for that day. I think most people agree it was an inside job and that the NIST investigation was BS. I just was asking a geniune question as to why Wood's evidence isn't considered, and not just Wood's but the evidence from all camps, they should all be part of a new investigation to find out the truth. I look forward to looking at your blog and seeing your side of things. I know we all want the truth about what happened that day.
Dear Mr. Nick Carraway and Mr. Craig McKee, The parallelism between 9/11 Truth and the Epstein files.
Those in positions of legal authority knew sufficient details from (portions of) the Epstein files to have justification and cause to initiate legal actions to prevent further crimes. They did not. And in cases, they covered it up.
If we consider, say, AE9/11Truth to be in a position of authority on 9/11 Truth, it was hamstrung much like authorities with Epstein. To Mr. McKee's point, look no further than the Pentagon (pun-intended) to see AE9/11T scope-limited. I'm just a member of the choir singing: "And that is not all AE9/11T scope-limited."
Mr. McKee wrote: "I think we do have evidence of thermite in the WTC dust."
Is that another AE9/11T scope-limit? I mean, we also have:
- Dust reports showing Uranium, Barium, and Stronium and all of their decay elements, indicating evidence of fission process.
- Water run-off reports showing Tritium, but having to re-define "trace levels" to be 55 times greater in order to explain away "the insignificance" of it. Tritium is a building block of all modern nuclear weapons.
- Videos that show radiation leaching off of the debris piles and selected pieces at Fresh Kills. The video tape technology of last century was high succeptible to radiation, causing glitches that wouldn't be noticed by the camera operator until play-back.
Mr. Carraway wrote: "i see no value in arguing over the 'how'...thermite vs DEW seams like a rounding error..."
Funny, because I think both sides of "thermite vs. DEW" are purposeful disinformation. Not rounding errors, but complete misdirections. Both can be debunked. [References available upon request.] So I guess I have to agree about there being no value in arging "thermite vs. DEW".
Of course, my 9/11 hobby-horse is exotic pre-mature fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW) that could be summarized as "nuclear-DEW." Think, 4 FGNW per detonation level and, say, 10 detonation levels per tower. Each hybrid fission-fusion; fission stage isn't designed for destruction but for heat requisite for the fusion stage; fusion stage isn't designed for destruction by heat wave and blast wave, but for the targeted release of highly energetic neutrons. Cone-shaped output. Mounted on outside walls of the inner core. Aimed upwards and away from the inner core on which they were mounted. [Gives rises to the anomaly called "the spire".]
[Bat-shit wild-ass speculation] One of the reasons given for JFK's un-aliving was his refusal to allow Israel nuclear weapons. Israel went on to steal US nuclear secrets, develop its own bombs, and perform nuclear tests, all the thumbing its nose at the UN's nuclear non-proliferation agreement and at allowing UN nuclear inspectors into Israel. Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty. Israel committed genocide in Gaza.
If we give any credance:
- to the "five dancing Arabs" or those in a moving van who were detained, not interrogated, flown back to Israel, and later on TV admitted they were Mossad agents charged with filming the 9/11 events.
- to the Israeli arts students on residence in the towers.
- to how Mossad agents lived closed to and monitored the Arab patsies given responsibility for the hijackings.
- to Chertoff and other Zionists and Christian Zionists in the G.W.Bush Administration.
Then it isn't a far-fetched to connect Israeli nuclear ambitions with 9/11 at the WTC. However, Israel has its hands so deep into the pockets of US arsenals, the 9/11 FGNW were probably US made. Israel was boots-to-the-ground while VP Cheney ran cover by distracting the military responses and coordinating the precision of the attacks.
What did Israel gain aside from the many billions the US gives them every year? The US fought Israeli wars and took out Israeli enemies (and enemies of the central bank).
The Israeli use of nukes on 9/11 is similar to the autrocities documented in the Epstein files. Namely, public revelation -- of the (1) nuclear usage on ourselves or (2) sexual assault => ritualistic murder of innocent children -- ought to lead to ...
... And there we have it. What the truth ought to lead to often doesn't, by design. And it is the "in your face" cover-up that pisses us off the most.
In summary, why the details of 9/11 destruction do matter is that they help reveal the callousness of the true perpetrators (Zionists) and may help nuclear-energize (pun intended) other movements, such as those against Frump fascism and Epstein-class crimes.
//
I agree...they did not just pancake down. There is no way - all the evidence screams something else. Likely bombs but I suppose DEW could be right. It doesn't really matter.
The first thing you need to do is own up to the fact that 911 was a false flag operation by the mossad. Remember the dancing israelis.
I agree that they were involved, but so was the U.S. government.
True, but the mossad was the mastermind. It was all part of a plan for the US to destroy countries for the zois.
While I agree that there is definitely evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11, as a Gentile who loves Israel and the Jewish people, I would ask that comments about Jewish involvement be balanced against the v obvious lead role that was played by the US Govt and it's talking parrot, the Mockingbird Media.
I am not the least interested in airbrushing Mossad involvement.
I simply ask for a fair hearing that is not fraud my ed in traditional Jew-hatred language.
Tky. Chris
Typo... "not fraud my ed"
should read
"not framed in"
Great to hear someone talking sense about 9/11. It needs to be on top of the political agenda disppite all the other crimes comitted since: wars, epstein/trump/CIA/Mossad).
What is indisputable about the 9/11 case is the massive coverup which is admitted to by FEMA and NIST. They admit to the destruction of evidence and to not searching for explosives. Both are the essence of high treason. So is the withholding of the numerous videotapes possibly showing what really hit Pentagon. So is the numerous other destructions /withholding of crucial evidence. Why is this so hard to accept by the legal system, and the otherwise sharp intellectual elite??
Good job!
I hope you guys have @911revision on. He's way more knowledgable about the evidence of the day than most other 9/11 truthers. Cheers
Dear Craig,
My apologies for not commenting on the principles, at the time when you first posted them.
The reason that I didn't comment was because they were so well laid out, so carefully thought through, so utterly reasonable, there wasn't anything else left to say!
On reflection, it would have been much kinder to have said this at the time.
Again, my apologies.
Excellent work!
Chris